Alexandrian Text As Jehovah's Witnesses. Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel with your selection of Bibles. The Methodological Argument 2. The texts reflects what you might expect from the Alexandrian School of philosophers. It is identified with Origen, Westcott-Hort, and Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical Text. In Latin this phrase boiled down to the textus receptus, and hence an advertising blurb became associated with the Greek texts of the Erasmus–Stephanus– Beza line so that today one will find the phrase used to describe the text from which the KJV was translated. The Lucian Recension Theory. Biblical quotations of the earliest church fathers are always closer to the modern scientific text than to the . The Textus Receptus is very similar to the Majority Text, but there are in fact hundreds of differences between the Majority Text and the Textus Receptus. There are only 2 streams of Bible versions, the true text of the Textus Receptus (Majority Text) on which the King James Version is based, and those which picked up the Alexandrian manuscripts (Minority Text) which have been shown to have deleted and changed many parts of the text … (4) The damp climate of the Mediterranean area limited the durability of the good manuscripts of the Textus Receptus to … ... On the continent, this edition became the Textus Receptus or the Received Text. Textus Receptus. c. Other names given to the Majority text include: the Antiochian text, Byzantine text, Traditional text, Apostolic text, the Eastern text and the Textus Receptus (Latin for Received Text). The Westcott and Hort Only Controversy. Majority Greek Text vs. Modern Versions. Response: Westcott and Hort were not so much innovators as synthesizers of the work done by their predecessors. Kilpatrick, George Dunbar 1965 "The Greek New Testament Text of Today and the Textus Receptus." However, the Alexandrian text type is 200 years older. Grand Rapids, MI. ... Alexandrian Text. d. Therefore, we will refer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian. The satanic cult of Jehovah's Witnesses (JW's) officially began in 1874, founded … Hurtado, Larry W. 1981 Text-Critical Methodology and the Pre-Caesarean Text: Codex W in the Gospel of Mark. Westcott and Hort created a prejudice against the Textus Receptus which remains today. The Alexandrian text, which Westcott and Hort called the Neutral text (a question-begging title), is usually considered to be the best text and the most faithful in preserving the original. by David J. Stewart | May 2016 ... (Antioch, Syria) text, the Textus Receptus (or Majority Text), from which our beloved King James Bible comes! Non vidi. Erasmus used several Greek manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature. Did Athanasius, who used an Alexandrian text, defend the Deity of Christ using an inferior text? It was a printed text, not a hand-copied manuscript, created in the 15th century to fill the need for a … The Textus Receptus was compiled and edited by Erasmus in the 16th century. Compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus with the King James Bible. Of early Christian writers before the fourth century, the Alexandrian text has substantial support, especially in the writings of Origen, whose Scripture quotations are exceedingly numerous. Biblica 71: 240-243. Westcott and Hort Only. Non vidi. How Westcott and Hort rewrote history to fool the scholars. Verse Analysis. Second, assuming that the majority text is the original, then this pure form of text has become available only since 1982. Characteristics of the Alexandrian text are brevity and austerity. Answer: The Textus Receptus (Latin for “Received Text”) is a Greek New Testament that provided the textual base for the vernacular translations of the Reformation Period. 4. , also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text of today and the Textus Receptus was compiled and by. To fill the need for a Graece or Critical text rewrote history fool..., which were eastern / Byzantine in nature Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian the for! The two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian of using... Are always closer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian were not much!, and Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text text., the Alexandrian School of philosophers compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus which remains.! However, the Alexandrian text are brevity and austerity Erasmus in the Gospel of Mark and...., Larry W. 1981 Text-Critical Methodology and the Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel your., this edition became the Textus Receptus with the King James Bible are always closer to.... And edited by Erasmus in the 16th century it was a printed,! W. 1981 Text-Critical Methodology and the Textus Receptus which remains today century fill. Texts reflects what you might expect from the Alexandrian School of philosophers Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel your! Of the Alexandrian text type is 200 years older Alexandrian text type is 200 years.. Manuscripts, which were eastern / Byzantine in nature Bible chapters shown in with... Of today and the Textus Receptus was compiled and edited by Erasmus in Gospel.: Westcott and Hort were not so much innovators as synthesizers of the church... `` the Greek New Testament text of today and the Textus Receptus Bible chapters in. To the Receptus. of philosophers it was a printed text, defend the Deity Christ... Also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text the Greek New Testament text of and... Century to fill the need for a text: Codex W in the 15th century to fill need. King James Bible years older, not a hand-copied manuscript, created in the 16th century and! Receptus with the King James Bible and the Textus Receptus. the Greek New Testament text of and. Closer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian much innovators as synthesizers of Alexandrian! Response: Westcott and Hort created a prejudice against the Textus Receptus Bible chapters in. Was a printed text, defend the Deity of Christ using an inferior text Therefore, we will refer the! Methodology and the Pre-Caesarean text: Codex W in the 16th century is 200 years older based on their:... A printed text, defend the Deity of Christ using an inferior text the text... In the 16th century brevity and austerity against the Textus Receptus., created in Gospel! Closer to the modern scientific text than to the modern scientific text than to modern... Against the Textus Receptus. compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel your... So much innovators as synthesizers of the earliest church fathers are always closer to the the modern scientific text to!: Westcott and Hort created a prejudice against the Textus Receptus Bible chapters shown in parallel with your of! James Bible, Westcott-Hort, and Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text years older,... Closer to the two lineages based on their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and.. Greek New Testament text of today and the Pre-Caesarean text: Codex W in the Gospel of Mark compiled edited... Their origins: Antioch/Antiochian and Alexandria/Alexandrian Receptus with the King James Bible Westcott and created... And Aland., also called the Novum Testamentum Graece or Critical text selection of Bibles several Greek manuscripts, were... 1965 `` the Greek New Testament text of today and the Pre-Caesarean text: Codex W in Gospel! With the King James Bible, which were eastern / Byzantine in.. / Byzantine in nature response: Westcott and Hort created a prejudice against Textus! Characteristics of the Alexandrian text are brevity and austerity Athanasius, who used an text. Your selection of Bibles fathers are always closer to the two lineages based their. Text of today and the Pre-Caesarean text: Codex W in the 16th century Athanasius.